Does Kindergarten Instruction Matter for Sustaining the Prekindergarten (PreK) Boost? Evidence From Individual- and Classroom-Level Survey and Observational Data

February 2022
Meghan P. McCormick, Mirjana Pralica, Christina Weiland, JoAnn Hsueh, Lillie Moffett, Paola Guerrero-Rosada, Amanda Weissman, Kehui Zhang, Michelle F. Maier, Catherine E. Snow, Emily Davies, Anne Taylor, Jason Sachs

The sustaining environments hypothesis theorizes that the lasting effects of PreK programs are contingent on the quality of the subsequent learning environment in early elementary school. The current study tests this theory by leveraging data from students (N = 462) who did and did not enroll in the Boston Public Schools (BPS) prekindergarten (PreK) program as well as features of their kindergarten instruction measured at the child- and classroom-levels using surveys and observations. Taken together, findings revealed limited evidence for the sustaining environments hypothesis. The bulk of the results were null, indicating that in general, associations between enrollment in BPS PreK and language, literacy, and math skills through the spring of kindergarten did not vary by kindergarten instructional experiences. When examining distinct types of instructional experiences, there were some inklings that child-level observational measures of kindergarten learning experiences-particularly those capturing constrained versus unconstrained instruction-were more predictive of PreK persistence than observed global classroom quality measures or survey-based measures of advanced instruction. However, these associations were not always specific to outcomes matching the content delivered during this instruction (math vs. literacy), consistent with the possibility of either cross-domain effects or that instructional variables are proxies for more general instructional practices. Findings for future research and theory are discussed.

The research reported here was conducted as a part of a study funded by Arnold Ventures and Grant R305N160018–17 from the Institute of Education Sciences to MDRC. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education. Thanks to the Boston Public Schools (BPS) Department of Early Childhood coaches and staff, the BPS Department of Research, the MDRC team, the Harvard Graduate School of Education team, and the University of Michigan team. Thank you to members of the Consortium on Early Childhood Intervention Impact who provided helpful feedback and comments on a draft of this article. Special thanks to the students and teachers who participated directly in the research. This study was not preregistered. Data are not yet publicly available but will be shared as a restricted access file—available via application—after the conclusion of the grant period in 2023.